4.3 Article

Diabetic foot ulcer severity predicts mortality among veterans with type 2 diabetes

期刊

JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND ITS COMPLICATIONS
卷 31, 期 3, 页码 556-561

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.11.020

关键词

Diabetes; Foot ulcer; Gangrene; Mortality; Vascular disease

资金

  1. Clinical and Translational Science Award (CSTA) program, through NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) [UL1TR000427]
  2. NIH [KL2TR000428, K24DK105340, P30DK092949]
  3. AHRQ [R01 HS018542, R01 HS018368]
  4. AHRQ [540366, 5R01HS018368-04, 5R01HS018542-03, 602812, 5R01HS018542-02, 539886] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Diabetic foot ulcers are associated with an increased risk of death. We evaluated whether ulcer severity at presentation predicts mortality. Methods: Patients from a national, retrospective, cohort of veterans with type 2 diabetes who developed incident diabetic foot ulcers between January 1, 2006 and September 1, 2010, were followed until death or the end of the study period, January 1, 2012. Ulcers were characterized as early stage, osteomyelitis, or gangrene at presentation. Cox proportional hazard regression identified independent predictors of death, controlling for comorbidities, laboratory parameters, and healthcare utilization. Results: 66,323 veterans were included in the cohort and followed for a mean of 27.7 months: 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 80.80%, 69.01% and 28.64%, respectively. Compared to early stage ulcers, gangrene was associated with an increased risk of mortality (HR 1.70, 95% C11.57-1.83, p < 0.001). The magnitude of this effect was greater than diagnosed vascular disease, i.e., coronary artery disease, peripheral arterial disease, or stroke. Conclusion: Initial diabetic foot ulcer severity is a more significant predictor of subsequent mortality than coronary artery disease, peripheral arterial disease, or stroke. Unrecognized or under-estimated vascular disease and/or sepsis secondary to gangrene should be explored as possible causal explanations. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据