4.2 Article

The Role of Policy Labs in Policy Experiment and Knowledge Transfer: A Comparison across the UK, Denmark, and Singapore

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLICY ANALYSIS
卷 22, 期 4, 页码 281-297

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13876988.2019.1668657

关键词

comparison; policy lab; policy experiment; knowledge transfer; case study

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [71774164, 1633004]
  2. Key Project of Ministry of Education [18JZD048]
  3. Singapore Ministry of Education AcRF Tier-2 Grant [MOE2016-T2-02-87]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Policy labs have been increasingly used to generate scientific evidence and political momentum to boost policy experiments, but our understanding of the conditions for knowledge creation and transfer through policy experiments in the labs is scarce. This paper compares the UK?s Cabinet Office?s Behavioral Insights Team (BIT), Denmark?s the Danish MindLab, and Singapore?s the Human Experience Lab (THE Lab) to identify their similarities and differences in fostering policy experiment and knowledge transfer. It is found that BIT as the ?Nudge Unit? is keen on bringing in rigorous scientific evidence to advocate effective albeit controversial policies, critical to its survival and influence in an adversarial political circumstance. MindLab takes more initiative to co-create and run projects together with agencies and organizations. THE Lab is dedicated to gleaning ethnographic insights from various stakeholders to support design thinking in policy implementation. These discernable differences can be attributed to their different political regimes and policy environments, which suggest workable avenues for policy labs in other countries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据