4.7 Article

Evaluating the regional social sustainability contribution of public-private partnerships in China: The development of an indicator system

期刊

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
卷 28, 期 1, 页码 259-278

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sd.2001

关键词

analytic hierarchy process (AHP); people-oriented urbanization; public-private partnerships (PPPs); social sustainability; social sustainability contribution evaluation system (SSCES) for PPPs

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71671042, 71472037]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  3. Program for Outstanding Young Teachers of Southeast University [2242015R30009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Public-private partnerships (PPPs) have been increasingly adopted in China. Sustainability of PPPs has become a priority for a sustainable development of PPPs. Most prior studies focus on sustainable implementation of PPP projects. Few research efforts have been done to examine the impacts of PPPs to sustainability from an external perspective and a more macro geographical scale. Meanwhile, the social aspect of the sustainability of PPPs has not been widely studied. Therefore, this study aims to propose a social sustainability contribution evaluation system (SSCES) for PPPs to evaluate PPPs' contribution to regional social sustainability at the institutional level. An indicator system of the SSCES for PPPs was developed, which included 8 requirements for socially sustainable development and 33 social sustainability indicators. The weights of indicators were determined by using the analytic hierarchy process method. The results indicate that, in the context of China, promoting people-oriented urbanization in PPPs can help enhance regional social sustainability. This study provides a useful evaluation tool for various stakeholders to evaluate the sustainability of PPPs from an institutional level, especially for local governments to review current PPP polices and make improvements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据