4.8 Review

Promising Applications of AIEgens in Animal Models

期刊

SMALL METHODS
卷 4, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smtd.201900583

关键词

aggregation-induced emissions; chemotherapy; fluorescence bioimaging; photodynamic therapy; photothermal therapy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21807057, 81672076, 81802116, 81871735]
  2. Medical Science and Technology Research Foundation of Guangdong Province [A2017326]
  3. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou [201510010097]
  4. Major Program of Health Care and Innovation of Guangzhou Project [201704020213, 201604020015]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2019B030301003]
  6. Guangdong Province Universities and Colleges Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme (2019)
  7. Outstanding Youths Development Scheme of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University [2018J002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In vivo investigations using small animal models are of great significance for the comprehensive understanding of biological and physiological functions-seeing is believing. Fluorescence imaging can provide real-time and dynamic information of living systems. During the past few years, aggregation-induced emission luminogens (AIEgens) are widely and rapidly developed for biological detection, imaging, and medicine, owing to their distinct advantages of structural variety, easy functionalization, strong luminescence, large Stokes shift, high photobleaching-resistance, good biocompatibility, and so forth. In this review, recent advances in applying AIEgens in living animals are highlighted, including in vivo vascular and tumor-targeted imaging, monitoring biological processes, disease diagnosis, and image-guided therapy. The aim of this review is to provide a well-rounded view of the potential applications of AIEgens for biomedical research at the preclinical animal level for researchers and clinicians, and to inspire more practical inventions that will improve or assist clinical techniques.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据