4.7 Article

Comparison between conjugated linoleic acid and essential fatty acids in preventing oxidative stress in bovine mammary epithelial cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE
卷 100, 期 3, 页码 2299-2309

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-11729

关键词

conjugated linoleic acid; essential fatty acids; oxidative status; bovine mammary cells

资金

  1. BASF SE, Ludwigshafen, Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Some in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated protective effects of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers against oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation. However, only a few and conflicting studies have been conducted showing the antioxidant potential of essential fatty acids. The objectives of the study were to compare the effects of CLA to other essential fatty acids on the thiol redox status of bovine mammary epithelia cells (BME-UV1) and their protective role against oxidative damage on the mammary gland by an in vitro study. The BME-UV1 cells were treated with complete medium containing 50 mu M of cis-9,trans-11 CLA, trans-10, cis-12 CLA, alpha t-linolenic acid, gamma-linolenic acid, and linoleic acid. To assess the cellular antioxidant response, glutathione, NADPH, and gamma-glutamyl-cysteine ligase activity were measured 48 h after addition of fatty acids (FA). Intracellular reactive oxygen species and malondialdehyde production were also assessed in cells supplemented with FA. Reactive oxygen species production after 3 h of H2O (2)exposure was assessed to evaluate and to compare the potential protection of different FA against H2O (2)-induced oxidative stress. All FA treatments induced an intracellular GSH increase, matched by high concentrations of NADPH and an increase of gamma-glutamyl-cysteine ligase activity. Cells supplemented with FA showed a reduction in intracellular malondialdehyde levels. In particular, CLA isomers and linoleic acid supplementation showed a better antioxidant cellular response against oxidative damage induced by 11202 compared with other FA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据