4.7 Article

Spillover of workplace IT satisfaction onto job satisfaction: The roles of job fit and professional fit

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.011

关键词

IT satisfaction; Job satisfaction; Satisfaction spillover; Job fit; Professional fit

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71271102]
  2. Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities of Southwestern University of Finance and Economics [JBK1802046]
  3. Sichuan Province Social Science Program Fund [SC18B130]
  4. Sichuan Provincial Department of Education Social Science Research Fund [2018120016]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2017A030313411]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With information technology (IT) increasingly penetrating in workplaces, employee satisfaction with workplace IT becomes an integral part of work and significantly influences work-related outcomes. Scant attention, however, has been paid to whether and how employees' IT satisfaction plays a role in generating job-related attitudinal changes among employees. Drawing upon satisfaction spillover theory, we developed and empirically tested a model to examine the relationship between individual satisfaction with workplace IT and job satisfaction. Specifically, we introduced two elements of user-task-technology fit-namely, job fit and professional fit-to examine the transition in employees' satisfaction from the technological domain to overall satisfaction with work. We found that job fit not only mediated but also strengthened the effect of workplace IT satisfaction on job satisfaction, whereas professional fit did not play a moderating role in the relationship between workplace IT satisfaction and job satisfaction. The findings suggest that practitioners should emphasize workplace IT as a crucial ingredient of the work context and improve employee experiences with using IT. More importantly, the fit of IT with employees' job and professional requirements is critical for this transition in satisfaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据