4.5 Article

Impacts of changing urban form on ecological efficiency in China: a comparison between urban agglomerations and administrative areas

期刊

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2019.1689932

关键词

ecological efficiency; urban form; threshold test; urban agglomeration; administrative area; DEA

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) Funded Projects for Distinguished Young Scholars [41501141, 41501136]
  2. Major program of the Chinese National Social Science Foundation [18ZDA040]
  3. China Scholarship Council (CSC) Project [201806270084, 201706250116, 201706275035]
  4. Wuhan University Research Fund for Young Scholar Teams in Humanities and Social Sciences [WHU2016024]
  5. Wuhan University Humanities and Social Sciences Independent Research Project [2018QN089]
  6. China Association for Science and Technology High-end Science and Technology Innovation Think Tank Doctoral Program [CXY-ZKQN-2019-052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper explored the impacts of the changing urban form on the ecological efficiency of administrative areas and urban agglomerations in China under different regional scales using the slack-based measure of efficiency model. It also measured the morphological characteristics of cities across several regions using the Largest Patch Index (LPI), Patch Density (PD), and Fractal Dimension (FD). Using the threshold regression model, the impact mechanism of urban form on ecological efficiency was examined. Results show that the ecological efficiency of the regions show an N type change over time. LPI and PD show a significant impact in promoting ecological efficiency while FD inhibits ecological efficiency but is not significant until the regional scale reaches 1,352 km(2). We conclude that the development of urban agglomeration is more conducive to improving regional ecological efficiency, which will give policymakers some inspiration in developing a regional development strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据