4.3 Article

Everything Is Perfect, and We Have No Problems: Detecting and Limiting Social Desirability Bias in Qualitative Research

期刊

QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 5, 页码 783-792

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1049732319889354

关键词

qualitative research; social desirability bias; Ethiopia; methodology

资金

  1. Innovating for Maternal and Child Health in Africa initiative-a partnership of Global Affairs Canada (GAC)
  2. Canada's International Development Research Centre (IDRC)
  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many qualitative research studies acknowledge the possibility of social desirability bias (a tendency to present reality to align with what is perceived to be socially acceptable) as a limitation that creates complexities in interpreting findings. Drawing on experiences conducting interviews and focus groups in rural Ethiopia, this article provides an empirical account of how one research team developed and employed strategies to detect and limit social desirability bias. Data collectors identified common cues for social desirability tendencies, relating to the nature of the responses given and word choice patterns. Strategies to avoid or limit bias included techniques for introducing the study, establishing rapport, and asking questions. Pre-fieldwork training with data collectors, regular debriefing sessions, and research team meetings provided opportunities to discuss social desirability tendencies and refine approaches to account for them throughout the research. Although social desirability bias in qualitative research may be intractable, it can be minimized.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据