4.8 Article

A conductive-dielectric gradient framework for stable lithium metal anode

期刊

ENERGY STORAGE MATERIALS
卷 24, 期 -, 页码 700-706

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.06.019

关键词

Li metal anode; Li dendrite; Gradient framework; Electric field distribution

资金

  1. Local Innovative and Research Teams Project of Guangdong Pearl River Talents Program [2017BT01N111]
  2. Shenzhen Geim Graphene Center
  3. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51578310]
  4. Guangdong Province Science and Technology Department [2015A030306010]
  5. Shenzhen Government [JCYJ20170412171720306, JSGG20170414143635496]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium (Li) metal is one of the most promising anode materials for future high-energy-density rechargeable batteries. However, the uncontrollable growth of dendrites and the related safety issue hindered its practical application. Involving three-dimensional (3D) frameworks for hosting Li metal can provide large electrochemically active surface area and thus endow more homogeneous deposition and delay dendrite formation. But a more ideal situation for ultimately safe and high-performance Li metal based battery is to enable a gradient Li deposition/dissolution process, with the merit of effective utilization of spatial dimension to stabilize Li metal anode to achieve superior electrochemical performance. Here, we report a conductive-dielectric gradient framework which can guide a bottom-up Li deposition and top-down Li dissolution within this structure, rendering controllable and stable Li metal deposition/dissolution process. As a result, in a symmetric cell such anode can deliver stable Li metal deposition/dissolution for 780 h with a low overpotential (<20 mV) at 1 mA cm(-2), and maintain superior cycle stability with a Coulombic efficiency over 95.6% even at a high current density of 8 mA cm(-2). This conductive-dielectric gradient structure design paves a new avenue to stabilize Li metal anode and improve the safety level of metal anode based batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据