4.6 Review

Managing ditches for agroecological engineering of landscape. A review

期刊

AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 999-1020

出版社

SPRINGER FRANCE
DOI: 10.1007/s13593-015-0301-6

关键词

Ditch; Ecosystem services; Farmed landscape; Management; Maintenance operation; Landscape processes; Water purification; Waterlogging control; Erosion control; Biodiversity conservation

资金

  1. French Office for Water and Aquatic Bodies (ONEMA)
  2. French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Agriculture must now feed the planet with the lowest environmental impact. Landscape management is a means to protect natural resources from the adverse impacts. In particular, the adequate management of ditches could improve crop quality. Here, we review ditch design and maintenance. We found the following major points: (1) ditch networks have been primarily designed for waterlogging control and erosion prevention. Nonetheless, when properly managed, farm ditches provide other important ecosystem services, namely groundwater recharge, flood attenuation, water purification, or biodiversity conservation. (2) All ditch ecosystem services depend on many geochemical, geophysical, and biological processes, whose occurrence and intensity vary largely with ditch characteristics. (3) The major ruling characteristics are vegetative cover; ditch morphology; slope orientation; reach connections such as piped sections and weirs, soil, sediment and litter properties, biota, and biofilms; and network topology. (4) Ditch maintenance is an efficient engineering tool to optimize ecosystem services because several ditch characteristics change widely with ditch maintenance. For instance, maintenance operations, dredging, chemical weeding, and burning improve waterlogging and soil erosion control, but they are negative for biodiversity conservation. Mowing has low adverse effects on biodiversity conservation and water purification when mowing is performed at an adequate season. The effects of burning have been poorly investigated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据