4.5 Article

Inferior vena cava collapsibility detects fluid responsiveness among spontaneously breathing critically-ill patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE
卷 41, 期 -, 页码 130-137

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.05.008

关键词

Inferior vena cava collapsibility; Fluid responsiveness; Point-of-care ultrasound; Spontaneously breathing

资金

  1. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care
  2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Measurement of inferior vena cava collapsibility (cIVC) by point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has been proposed as a viable, non-invasive means of assessing fluid responsiveness. We aimed to determine the ability of cIVC to identify patients who will respond to additional intravenous fluid (IVF) administration among spontaneously breathing critically-ill patients. Methods: Prospective observational trial of spontaneously breathing critically-ill patients. cIVC was obtained 3 cm caudal from the right atrium and IVC junction using POCUS. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a >= 10% increase in cardiac index following a 500 ml IVF bolus; measured using bioreactance (NICOM (TM), Cheetah Medical). cIVC was compared with fluid responsiveness and a cIVC optimal value was identified. Results: Of the 124 participants, 49% were fluid responders. cIVC was able to detect fluid responsiveness: AUC = 0.84 [0.76, 0.91]. The optimum cutoff point for cIVC was identified as 25% (LR+ 4.56 [2.72, 7.66], LR-0.16 [0.08, 0.31]). A cIVC of 25% produced a lower misclassification rate (16.1%) for determining fluid responsiveness than the previous suggested cutoff values of 40% (34.7%). Conclusion: IVC collapsibility, as measured by POCUS, performs well in distinguishing fluid responders from non-responders, and may be used to guide IVF resuscitation among spontaneously breathing critically-ill patients. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据