4.6 Article

Access to marine ecosystem services: Examining entanglement and legitimacy in customary institutions

期刊

WORLD DEVELOPMENT
卷 126, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104730

关键词

Coral reefs; Modernity; Custom; Papua New Guinea; Coastal communities

资金

  1. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University
  2. Lancaster Environment Centre
  3. ARC Future Fellowship
  4. ARC Discovery Project [DP180100965]
  5. Australian Research Council [CE140100020, FT160100047]
  6. Pew Charitable Trust
  7. Paul M. Angell Family Foundation
  8. CGIAR Trust Fund
  9. CGIAR Research Program on Fish Agri-Food Systems (FISH)
  10. Australian Research Council [FT160100047] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ecosystem services have become a dominant paradigm for understanding how people derive well-being from ecosystems. However, the framework has been critiqued for over-emphasizing the availability of services as a proxy for benefits, and thus missing the socially-stratified ways that people access ecosystem services. We aim to contribute to ecosystem services' theoretical treatment of access by drawing on ideas from political ecology (legitimacy) and anthropology (entanglement). We hypothesize that where customary and modem forms of resource management co-exist, changes in customary institutions will also change people's ability to and means of benefiting from ecosystem services, with implications for well-being. We ask a) what are the constellations of social, economic, and institutional mechanisms that enable or hinder access to a range of provisioning ecosystem services; and b) how are these constellations shifting as different elements of customary institutions gain or lose legitimacy in the process of entanglement with modernity? Through a qualitative mixed-methods case study in a coastal atoll community in Papua New Guinea, we identify key access mechanisms across the value chain of marine provisioning services. Our study finds the legitimacy of customary systems - and thus their power in shaping access - has eroded unevenly for some ecosystem services, and some people within the community (e.g. younger men), and less for others (e.g. women), and that different marine provisioning services are shaped by specific access mechanisms, which vary along the value chain. Our findings suggest that attention to entanglement and legitimacy can help ecosystem services approaches capture the dynamic and relational aspects of power that shape how people navigate access to resources in a changing world. We contend that viewing power as relational illuminates how customary institutions lose or gain legitimacy as they become entangled with modernity. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据