3.8 Article

Imaging features and classification of peritumoral edema in vestibular schwannoma

期刊

NEURORADIOLOGY JOURNAL
卷 33, 期 2, 页码 169-173

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1971400919896253

关键词

Vestibular schwannoma; peritumoral edema; cerebellopontine angle; neuroimaging; classification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Peritumoral edema (PTE) is rarely present in patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS). We studied the correlation between radiological tumor characteristics and the presence of edema, describe its magnetic resonance imaging features and classify the different edema patterns. Methods We analysed 605 consecutive patients treated for VS at our Institute. PTE was found in 30 patients, studied on fluid attenuated inversion recovery sequences and categorised as involving the brachium pontis, cerebellum and/or brainstem. Tumor volume, shape, surface, internal structure and axis of growth were evaluated and compared to a matched series of 30 patients without PTE. Results In our population of patients, 5% showed PTE. Edema involved the brachium pontis in 22 cases (88%), cerebellum in 15 (60%) and brainstem in 3 (12%). PTE was classified as mild (one region involved), moderate (two regions) and severe (three regions). Edema was present not only perpendicular to the major tumor growth axis but also parallel to it (91%). The difference between the two groups in regards to tumor shape and surface was not significant. We found no correlation between tumor and edema volumes. Conclusions VS can cause PTE, but its incidence is less frequent than in skull base meningiomas. PTE involves most frequently the brachium pontis, followed by the cerebellum and brainstem. Its occurrence correlates with tumor size but not with other radiological VS features. PTE is not always located perpendicular to the major axis of tumor growth, which indicated that the compressive theory proposed for meningiomas is not plausible explanation for its manifestation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据