4.6 Article

Internal delensing of Planck CMB temperature and polarization

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/05/035

关键词

CMBR polarisation; gravitational lensing; gravitational waves and CMBR polarization

资金

  1. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP) / ERC Grant [616170]
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L000652/1, ST/N000927/1]
  3. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/N000927/1, ST/P000525/1, ST/L000652/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. STFC [ST/P000525/1, ST/L000652/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a first internal delensing of CMB maps, both in temperature and polarization, using the public foreground-cleaned (SMICA) Planck 2015 maps. After forming quadratic estimates of the lensing potential, we use the corresponding displacement field to undo the lensing on the same data. We build differences of the delensed spectra to the original data spectra specifically to look for delensing signatures. After taking into account reconstruction noise biases in the delensed spectra, we find an expected sharpening of the power spectrum acoustic peaks with a delensing efficiency of 29% (TT) 25% (TE) and 22% (EE). The detection significance of the delensing effects is very high in all spectra: 12 sigma in EE polarization; 18 sigma in TE; and 20 sigma in TT. The null hypothesis of no lensing in the maps is rejected at 26s. While direct detection of the power in lensing B-modes themselves is not possible at high significance at Planck noise levels, we do detect (at 4.5 sigma under the null hypothesis) delensing effects in the B-mode map, with 7% reduction in lensing power. Our results provide a first demonstration of polarization delensing, and generally of internal CMB delensing, and stand in agreement with the baseline ACDM Planck 2015 cosmology expectations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据