4.6 Article

Adaptive Bilevel Approximation Technique for Multiobjective Evolutionary Optimization

期刊

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000643

关键词

Anchored ANOVA decomposition; Gaussian process; NSGA-II; Pareto front

资金

  1. MHRD, Government of India
  2. CSIR [22(0712)/16/EMR-II]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The computational intensiveness of evolutionary algorithms (EAs) in dealing with large-scale problems has been of great concern over the years. In order to reduce the computational burden associated with EAs initially, an anchored ANOVA decomposition model was integrated with the elitist nondominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II). Later, an improved version of the former framework, a novel approximation technique was developed and specialized to solve typical case scenarios often encountered, such as problems with nonconvex and disconnected Pareto optimal fronts. This proposed tool has been referred to as adaptive bilevel error-sensitivity based anchored ANOVA decomposition (ABE-ANOVA). ABE-ANOVA has been developed by the amalgamation of anchored ANOVA decomposition and Gaussian process (GP) model. They are coupled in such a way that anchored ANOVA handles the global behavior of the model using a set of component functions and GP interpolates local variations as a function of sample points, resulting in a two-level approximation. The study proves that ABE-ANOVA assisted NSGA-II is much more robust as compared to ANOVA assisted NSGA-II, especially in handling complex scenarios. Implementation of the proposed approaches have been demonstrated with the help of several multiobjective analytical examples and a few finite element problems. Performance has been assessed by comparing simulation of the actual model with NSGA-II and a few other algorithms. Excellent results in terms of accuracy and computational effort makes the proposed method potential for real-time applications. (C) 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据