4.6 Article

Robust Fano resonance in a topological mechanical beam

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 101, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.024101

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11902223]
  2. Shanghai Pujiang Program [19PJ1410100]
  3. program for professor of special appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning
  4. Tongji University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The advances in topological condensed matter physics enable the manipulation of classic waves in different ways, such as unidirectional propagation featuring the suppression of backscattering and the robustness against impurities and disorder, making it possible to endow classical phenomena with topological properties. Fano resonance, a widely spread and basic kind of resonance, features an asymmetric line shape with an ultrahigh quality factor Q that usually requires delicate designs and precise fabrication. In this work, we achieve a robust Fano mechanical resonance with topological protection by engineering band inversion of two different vibrating symmetries of a pillared beam that gives rise to dark and bright edge modes. The Fano resonance results from the constructive and destructive interferences between topological dark and bright modes. It is further demonstrated that the Fano asymmetric shape of the transmission peak and its frequency are robust against random perturbations in the pillars' position as long as the symmetry is conserved. If random perturbations break the symmetry and only band inversion is involved, the asymmetric line shape of the Fano resonance weakens until disappearing before the closure of the bulk band gap, since the excitation will couple all fundamental modes of the beam. The analysis of the robustness of Fano resonance originating from band inversion and symmetry protection reveals the nature of topological protection which can be applied to design topological high-Q resonance in sensing application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据