4.4 Article

Accuracy of finite-difference harmonic frequencies in density functional theory

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY
卷 38, 期 19, 页码 1678-1684

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.24811

关键词

finite difference; harmonic frequencies; isotopic shifts; noncovalent interactions; density functional theory

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences [DE-SC0008550]
  2. National Science Foundation [CHE-1300603]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Analytic Hessians are often viewed as essential for the calculation of accurate harmonic frequencies, but the implementation of analytic second derivatives is nontrivial and solution of the requisite coupled-perturbed equations engenders a sizable memory footprint for large systems, given that these equations are not required for energy and gradient calculations in density functional theory. Here, we benchmark the alternative approach to harmonic frequencies based on finite differences of analytic first derivatives, a procedure that is amenable to large-scale parallelization. Not only for absolute frequencies but also for isotopic and conformer-dependent frequency shifts in flexible molecules, we find that the finite-difference approach exhibits mean errors<0.1 cm(-1) as compared to results based on an analytic Hessian. For very small frequencies corresponding to nonbonded vibrations in noncovalent complexes (for which the harmonic approximation is questionable anyway), the finite-difference error can be larger, but even in these cases the errors can be reduced below 0.1 cm(-1) by judicious choice of the displacement step size and a higher-order finite-difference approach. The surprising accuracy and robustness of the finite-difference results suggests that availability of the analytic Hessian is not so important in today's era of commodity processors that are readily available in large numbers. (c) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据