4.7 Article

Organic fouling mechanisms in forward osmosis membrane process under elevated feed and draw solution temperatures

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 355, 期 -, 页码 169-177

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.10.041

关键词

Forward osmosis; Organic fouling; Draw and feed solution temperature; Organic convection and diffusion; Temperature polarization

资金

  1. Fundamental R&D Program for Technology of World Premier Materials-Ministry of Knowledge Economy, Republic of Korea [10037715]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organic fouling mechanisms in forward osmosis (FO) were systematically investigated at varying feed and draw temperatures. The effect of temperature variation on FO performance was first examined without foulants. When draw temperature increased, internal concentration polarization (ICP) decreased, which caused water flux to increase. Water flux was also improved with increasing feed temperature due to water permeability increased by decreased viscosity. Thus it can be deduced that water flux enhancement was induced by combined effects of reduced ICP and enhanced water permeability. A series of fouling experiments was then elaborately designed to fundamentally elucidate organic fouling mechanisms. Results demonstrated that organic fouling was significantly influenced by convective and diffusive organic transports induced by increasing temperature. Faster flux decline was observed with increasing draw temperature, primarily due to increased permeation drag. When increasing feed temperature, FO membrane was less fouled, attributing to enhanced organic back diffusion from membrane surface as well as increased organic solubility. Furthermore, fouling became more severe above certain critical flux at which organic convection by permeation drag dominated fouling mechanism as seen with escalating both temperatures simultaneously. Findings frdm this study can be utilized beneficially when FO temperature may be varied and needs to be optimized. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据