4.7 Article

de Sitter duality and logarithmic decay of dark energy

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 101, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.023504

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Center of Theoretical Sciences (NCTS) [16K05336, 16H03977, 19K03835]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate infrared dynamics of four-dimensional Einstein gravity in de Sitter space. We set up a general framework to investigate dynamical scaling relations in quantum/classical gravitational theories. The conformal mode dependence of Einstein gravity is renormalized to the extent that general covariance is not manifest. We point out that the introduction of an inflaton is necessary as a counterterm. We observe and postulate a duality between quantum effects in Einstein gravity and classical evolutions in an inflation (or quintessence) model. The effective action of Einstein gravity can be constructed as an inflation model with manifest general covariance. We show that g = G(N)H(2)/pi: the only dimensionless coupling of the Hubble parameter H-2 and the Newton's coupling G(N) in Einstein gravity is screened by the infrared fluctuations of the conformal mode. We evaluate the one-loop beta function of g with respect to the cosmic time log Ht as beta(g) = -(1/2)g(2), i.e., g is asymptotically free toward the future. The exact beta function with the backreaction of g reveals the existence of the ultraviolet fixed point. It indicates that the de Sitter expansion stared at the Planck scale with a minimal entropy S = 2. We have identified the de Sitter entropy 1/g with the von Neumann entropy of the conformal zero mode. The former evolves according to the screening of g and the Gibbons-Hawking formula. The latter is found to increase by diffusion in the stochastic process at the horizon in a consistent way. Our Universe is located very close to the fixed point g = 0 with a large entropy. We discuss possible physical implications of our results such as logarithmic decay of dark energy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据