4.5 Article

Exclusive π0p electroproduction off protons in the resonance region at photon virtualities 0.4 GeV2 ≤ Q2 ≤ 1 GeV2

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
卷 101, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.101.015208

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG-04ER41309]
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics
  4. Physics Department at Moscow State University
  5. French Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  6. Commissariat lEnergie Atomique
  7. French-American Cultural Exchange (FACE)
  8. Italian Instituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN)
  9. Chilean Comisin Nacional de Investigacin Cientfica y Tecnolgica (CON-ICYT)
  10. National Research Foundation of Korea
  11. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC)
  12. [DE-AC05-06OR23177]
  13. STFC [ST/P004385/2, ST/P004458/1, ST/P004385/1, ST/T002077/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The exclusive electroproduction process ep -> e' p' pi(0) was measured in the range of photon virtualities Q(2) = 0.4-1.0 GeV2 and the invariant mass range of the p pi(0) system of W = 1.1-1.8 GeV. These kinematics are covered in exclusive pi(0) electroproduction off the proton with nearly complete angular coverage in the p pi(0) center-of-mass system and with high statistical accuracy. Nearly 36 000 cross-section points were measured, and the structure functions sigma(T) + epsilon sigma(L), sigma(LT), and sigma(TT), were extracted via fitting the phi(pi 0) dependence of the cross section. A Legendre polynomial expansion analysis demonstrates the sensitivity of our data to high-lying N* and Delta* resonances with M > 1.6 GeV. As part of a broad effort to determine the electrocouplings of the N* and Delta* resonances using both single- and double-pion electroproduction, this dataset is crucial for the reliable extraction of the high-lying resonance electrocouplings from the combined isospin analysis of the N pi and pi(+)pi(-)p channels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据