4.6 Article

Emergence and role of dipolar dislocation patterns in discrete and continuum formulations of plasticity

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 101, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.024105

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research, Development and Innovation Office of Hungary [NKFIH-K-119561, NKFIH-KH-125380]
  2. Czech Science Foundation [15-10821S]
  3. National Science Foundation, DMR-MPS [1709568]
  4. Hungarian Ministry of Human Capacities [1783-3/2018/FEKUTSRAT]
  5. New National Excellence Program of the Hungarian Ministry of Human Capacities [UNKP-18-4]
  6. Janos Bolyai Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
  7. Division Of Materials Research
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1709568] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The plasticity transition, at the yield strength of a crystal, typically signifies the tendency of dislocation defects towards relatively unrestricted motion. An isolated dislocation moves in the slip plane with velocity proportional to the shear stress, while dislocation ensembles move towards satisfying emergent collective elastoplastic modes through the long-range interactions. Collective dislocation motions are discussed in terms of the elusively defined back stress. In this paper, we present a stochastic continuum model that is based on a two-dimensional continuum dislocation dynamics theory that clarifies the role of back stress and demonstrates precise agreement with the collective behavior of its discrete counterpart as a function of applied load and with only three essential free parameters. The main ingredients of the continuum theory are the evolution equations of statistically stored and geometrically necessary dislocation densities, which are driven by the long-range internal stress; a stochastic yield stress; and, finally, two local diffusion-like terms. The agreement is shown primarily in terms of the patterning characteristics that include the formation of dipolar dislocation walls.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据