4.7 Article

Osmotically driven membrane processes by using a spiral wound module - Modeling, experimentation and numerical parameter estimation

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 361, 期 -, 页码 81-94

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.01.025

关键词

Pressure retarded osmosis; Forward osmosis; Spiral wound module; Solution diffusion model; Numerical parameter estimation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) and forward osmosis (FO) are osmotically driven membrane processes and emerging as viable methods for capturing clean energy and producing fresh water from sea water, respectively. The critical problems restricting the application of these processes are the accurate design and analysis of the membrane module or module configurations. Hence, a mathematical model is obtained to predict the performance of a spiral wound membrane module for osmotically driven membrane processes. Transport phenomena through the membrane are described by the previously proposed solution diffusion based model. In the current work, this model is coupled with the differential mass balances on the feed and permeate sides of the module. In addition, the Darcy's theory is used in the model to incorporate the pressure drop in the channels of module. The finite difference method is employed to solve coupled algebraic and ordinary differential equations. Here, we also employ a combination of two optimization techniques (Univariate and Fibonacci three point methods) with laboratory scale experimental data points to estimate the unknown parameters of the model. These estimated parameters are then used to predict the performance of FO and PRO at some other operating conditions and validate the mathematical model. Relatively lower maximum power density is observed at a lower draw side hydraulic pressure in the spiral wound module as compared to power density in a membrane test cell. The experimental results obtained by this module matched well with the model predictions. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据