4.3 Article

Real-time scheduling optimization considering the unexpected events in home health care

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION
卷 37, 期 1, 页码 196-220

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10878-017-0220-3

关键词

Home health care; Unexpected events; Real-time scheduling; Improved memetic algorithm

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71472065, 71772065]
  2. Ministry of Education of China [14YJC630026, 16YJC790078]
  3. Key projects of Shanghai soft science Research Program [17692107000]
  4. Shanghai Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science [2016EJB003]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017ECNU-HWFW035]
  6. Shanghai Pujiang Program [14PJC027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Home health care, a new kind of health services that can be given in home for special populations (elderly, disabled, youth, etc.), is usually less expensive, more convenient and more efficient. Based on the face-to-face (in-person) interviews, we find that scheduling arrangements of home health care are often affected by some unexpected events such as cancellation of services, demand for emergency care and medical device failures. These events may lead to medical scheduling conflicts and therefore might decrease patient satisfaction due to the delayed service. Considering the emergencies in the home health care, this study takes the home health care mode under the unexpected events as the research object and focuses on the time window constraints involved in the real-time scheduling problem. In order to obtain an optimal medical dispatch program and ensure patients' golden period for treatment, we establish an effective real-time scheduling model to minimize the total required time of scheduling, and propose an improved memetic algorithm to optimize the model. Empirical analysis was then adopted to verify the rationality of the model. Finally, we analyze the practical effect of dispatching decision and put forward the recommendations for future research directions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据