4.7 Article

Tumor-Derived Soluble MICA Obstructs the NKG2D Pathway to Restrain NK Cytotoxicity

期刊

AGING AND DISEASE
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 118-128

出版社

INT SOC AGING & DISEASE
DOI: 10.14336/AD.2019.1017

关键词

hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); NKG2D; soluble MICA; NKG2D receptor pathway; tumor immune escape

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81571562, 81873875]
  2. Hunan Science and Technology Project Foundation [2018 JJ2549]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The natural killer group 2D (NKG2D) receptor and its ligands play important roles in immune surveillance. In this study, we observed that the average serum soluble MICA (sMICA) concentration of 174 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients was significantly higher than that in 80 healthy subjects (602.17 +/- 338.15 vs. 72.26 +/- 87.88 pg/ml, t = 3.107, P.002). The levels of serum sMICA in 44 HCC patients with initial levels above 400 pWml declined significantly after surgical removal of the fiver cancer tissue (P<0.001). Moreover, the mean survival time of HCC patients who had sMICA above 400 pgiml was significantly shorter than that HCC patients with lower sMICA levels (P<0.001). Using the reporter cell line (NKG2D-2B4) in which activation of the NKG2D receptor pathway results in GFP expression based on the stimulation of immobilized rMICA, we showed that the number of GFP-expressing cells decreased sharply in presence of sMICA. Upon adding sMICA, the release of cytokines IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, and IL-8 by NK cell line (NKL) under stimulation of immobilized rMICA was blocked. Using MICA-expressing cells as the target cells, we observed that about 80% of target cells were killed by NKL at E:T of 10:1, but in presence of sMICA(high) serum of HCC patients, the dead target cells were reduced to 30.8%. Compared in presence of sMICA(low) serum from HCC patients, there were 63.7% of target cells dead (v0.043). Thus, our data suggested that sMICA obstructs the activation of NKG2D pathway to protect tumor cells from NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据