4.7 Article

Silica-supported Au@hollow-SiO2 particles with outstanding catalytic activity prepared via block copolymer template approach

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 491, 期 -, 页码 246-254

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.12.051

关键词

Nanocatalyst; Yolk-shell; Sol-gel; Block copolymer micelles; Template

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [STA 324/51-1, HO 5526/1-1]
  2. Department of Science and Technology, India [SB/S1/PC-016/2013]
  3. LG Yeonam Foundation
  4. MEST of Korea through Basic Science Research Program [2013R1A1A2063696]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013R1A1A2063696] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Catalytically active Au@hollow-SiO2 particles embedded in porous silica support (Au@hollow-SiO2@PSS) were prepared by using spherical micelles from poly(styrene)-block-poly(4-vinyl pyridine) block copolymer as a sacrificial template. Drastic increase of the shell porosity was observed after pyrolytic removal of polymeric template because the stretched poly(4-vinyl pyridine) chains interpenetrating with silica shell acted as an effective porogen. The embedding of Au@hollow-SiO2 particles in porous silica support prevented their fusion during pyrolysis. The catalytic activity of Au@hollow-SiO2@PSS was investigated using a model reaction of catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol and reductive degradation of Congo redazo-dye. Significantly, to the best of our knowledge, Au@hollow-SiO2@PSS catalyst shows the highest activity among analogous systems reported till now in literature. Such high activity was attributed to the presence of multiple pores within silica shell of Au@hollow-SiO2 particles and easy accessibility of reagents to the catalytically active sites of the ligand-free gold surface through the porous silica support. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据