4.7 Article

How does the size of gold nanoparticles depend on citrate to gold ratio in Turkevich synthesis? Final answer to a debated question

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 492, 期 -, 页码 191-198

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.10.065

关键词

Nanoparticle; Gold; Turkevich; Multimodal characterization; Dynamic light scattering; Transmission electron microscopy

资金

  1. Commissariat General a l'Investissement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dependence between the size of gold nanoparticle(AuNP) and the citrate to gold molar ratio (X) is still a matter of debate 65 years after the seminal work by Turkevich et al. for high X values. We assume that this dispersion of results is due to the variation of certain parameters that are often not mentioned in the protocols, and to the use of a single characterization technique (dynamic light scattering (DLS) or transmission electron microscopy (TEM)). To adress definitely the question of this dependence, we have synthesized AuNPs with very precise protocols ensuring that the only parameters to be modified are X and the sequence of reagent addition. We have then studied, for the first time, the dependence of the size with X quantitatively with a multimodal approach (UV-Visible spectroscopy, DLS and TEM) for 2 synthetic routes differing only by the sequence of reagent addition. We show unambiguously that AuNPs' size decay monotonically, with X whatever the order of reagent addition. It allows us to exclude the occurrence of a measurable discontinuity for a peculiar value of X that prompted some authors to postulate the existence of two different reaction pathways when the citrate to gold molar ratio is around this value. In contrast, our result is in line with one reaction pathway, likely a seed-mediated growth mechanism, which should leads to monotonic size decrease. Also, we note that our result agrees with the sole available theoretical prediction (Kumar et al., 2007) on the whole range of X. Despite this apparent agreement, we point some contradictions between recent experimental results and basal hypothesis of this model. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据