4.7 Article

Optimization of cellulose and sugarcane bagasse oxidation: Application for adsorptive removal of crystal violet and auramine-O from aqueous solution

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 494, 期 -, 页码 223-241

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.01.085

关键词

Oxidized cellulose; Oxidized sugarcane bagasse; Adsorption; Desorption; Crystal violet; Auramine-O

资金

  1. Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais - Brazil (FAPEMIG) [CEX APQ-01945/13, CEX APQ-01764/14]
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico - Brazil (CNPq) [448346/2014-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cellulose (Cel) and sugarcane bagasse (SB) were oxidized with an H3PO4-NaNO2 mixture to obtain adsorbent materials with high contents of carboxylic groups. The oxidation reactions of Cel and SB were optimized using design of experiments (DOE) and response surface methodology (RSM). The optimized synthesis conditions yielded Cox and SBox with 4.8 mmol/g and 4.5 mmol/g of carboxylic acid groups, respectively. Cox and SBox were characterized by FTIR, TGA, PZC and solid-state C-13 NMR. The adsorption of the model cationic dyes crystal violet (CV) and auramine- O (AO) on Cox and SBox in aqueous solution was investigated as a function of the solution pH, the contact time and the initial dye concentration. The adsorption of CV and AO on Cox was described by the Elovich equation and the pseudo-first-order kinetic model respectively, while the adsorption of CV and AO on SBox was described by the pseudo-second order kinetic model. Adsorption isotherms were well fitted by the Langmuir and Konda models, with maximum adsorption capacities (Q(max)) of 1117.8 mg/g of CV and 1223.3 mg/g of AO on Cox and 1018.2 mg/g of CV and 682.8 mg/g of AO on SBox. Desorption efficiencies were in the range of 50-52% and re-adsorption capacities varied from 65 to 81%, showing the possibility of reuse of both adsorbent materials. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据