4.7 Article

Magnetic chitosan/anaerobic granular sludge composite: Synthesis, characterization and application in heavy metal ions removal

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 508, 期 -, 页码 405-414

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.08.067

关键词

Anaerobic granular sludge; Magnetic; Chitosan; Biosorption; Heavy metal

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21377046]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR201702070162]
  3. Special project of independent innovation and achievements transformation of Shandong Province [2014ZZCX05101]
  4. Science and technology development plan project of Shandong province [2014GGH217006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In present study, magnetic anaerobic granule sludge/chitosan (M-CS-AnGS) composite was synthesized and applied to remove Pb(II) and Cu(II) from aqueous solution. The physicochemical properties of prepared M-CS-AnGS were characterized by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Zeta potential analysis and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The factors affecting adsorption performance in view of different sorbents, adsorbent dosage, pH value and contact time were conducted to obtain optimum conditions of Pb(II) and Cu(II) onto M-CS-AnGS. The adsorption kinetics of Pb(II) and Cu(II) were better fitted with pseudo-second-order kinetic mode and Langmuir isotherm. The maximum adsorption capacities for Pb(II) and Cu(II) were 97.97 and 83.65 mg/g, respectively. According to FTIR, Zeta potential and XPS analysis, it was found that the adsorption mechanisms Pb(II) and Cu(II) onto M-CS-AnGS were mainly caused by surface complexation and electrostatic attraction. In addition, M-CS-AnGS could be easily separated under an external magnetic field. The obtained result suggested that M-CS-AnGS composite could be used as a promising adsorbent for metal removal from aqueous solution. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据