4.7 Article

Antifouling zwitterionic hydrogel coating improves hemocompatibility of activated carbon hemoadsorbent

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 503, 期 -, 页码 168-177

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.04.024

关键词

Zwitterionic hydrogel; Anti-biofouling; Activated carbon; Adsorption; Hemocompatibility

资金

  1. National Natural Science Funds for Excellent Young Scholars [21422605]
  2. National Natural Science Funds for Innovation Research Groups [21621004]
  3. Tianjin Natural Science Foundation [14JCYB-JC41600]
  4. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20130032120089]
  5. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-13-0417]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activated carbon has been widely used in hemoperfusion treatments. However, its performance has been significantly compromised by their poor hemocompatibility. In this work, we developed a novel antifouling adsorbent based on zwitterionic poly-carboxybetaine (PCB) hydrogel and powdered activated carbon (PAC) to improve hemocompatibility. We found this new adsorbent (PCB-PAC) was highly stable with negligible leakage of activated carbon debris. It could efficiently resist protein adsorption and avoid any hemolysis effect. The adsorption performance of PCB-PAC for methylene blue was not influenced in a single protein solution or even in 100% fetal bovine serum (FBS), in which pristine PAC lost 50% of its adsorption ability. The isotherms results showed that the adsorption process of PCB-PAC fitted the Langmuir isotherm well, indicating that the PAC particles were homogenously distributed in the PCB hydrogel matrix. Moreover, PCB-PAC could also adsorb bilirubin molecules bound to albumin in solution, while pristine PAC showed no discernible adsorption effect. Findings in this work hold great potential to significantly improve the performance and efficiency of current extracorporeal devices for removing toxins from blood directly. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据