4.7 Article

Hybrid nanomaterial of α-Co(OH)2 nanosheets and few-layer graphene as an enhanced electrode material for supercapacitors

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 486, 期 -, 页码 344-350

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.09.064

关键词

Cobalt hydroxide; Few-layer graphene; Delamination; Electrochemical capacitor

资金

  1. Public Projects (Analysis and Test) of Zhejiang Province [2015C37027]
  2. Experimental technology research project of ZJU, China [SYB201602]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Supercapacitor with metal hydroxide nanosheets as electrode can have high capacitance. However, the cycling stability and high rate capacity is low due to the low electrical conductivity. Here, the exfoliated ot-Co(OH)(2) nanosheets with high capacitance has been assembled on few-layer graphene with high electric conductivity by a facile yet effective and scalable solution method. Exfoliated hydrotalcite-like cx-Co(OH)(2) nanosheets and few-layer graphene suspensions were prepared by a simple ultrasonication in formamide and N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone, respectively. Subsequently, a hybrid was made by self-assembly of ot-Co(OH)(2) and few-layer graphene when the two dispersions were mixed at room temperature. The hybrid material provided a high specific capacitance of 567.1 Fig at 1 A/g, while a better rate capability and better stability were achieved compared to that mad of pristine and single exfoliated c-Co(OH)(2). When the hybrid nanocomposite was used as a positive electrode and activated carbon was applied as negative electrode to assembly an asymmetric capacitor, an energy density of 21.2 Wh/kg at a power density of 0.41 kW/kg within a potential of 1.65 V was delivered. The high electrochemical performance and facile solution-based synthesis method suggested that the hybrid of exfoliated alpha-Co(OH)(2)/few-layer graphene could be a potential electrode material for electrochemical capacitor. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据