4.6 Article

Grafting metal complexes onto amorphous supports: from elementary steps to catalyst site populations via kernel regression

期刊

REACTION CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 66-76

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9re00357f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Energy Basic Energy Sciences Catalysis Award [DE-FG02-03ER15467]
  2. National Science Foundation CBET Award [1605867]
  3. Department of Energy Computational Chemical Sciences Award [DE-SC0019488]
  4. National Science Foundation [CNS-1725797]
  5. California NanoSystems Institute
  6. Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC) at UC Santa Barbara [NSF DMR 1720256]
  7. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-03ER15467, DE-SC0019488] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  8. Directorate For Engineering [1605867] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1605867] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ab initio computational studies have made tremendous progress in describing the behavior of molecular (homogeneous) catalysts and crystalline versions of heterogeneous catalysts, but not for amorphous heterogeneous catalysts. Even widely used industrial amorphous catalysts like atomically dispersed Cr on silica remain poorly understood and largely intractable to computational investigation. The central problems are that (i) the amorphous support presents an unknown quenched disordered structure, (ii) metal atoms attach to various surface grafting sites with different rates, and (iii) the resulting grafted sites have different activation and catalytic reaction kinetics. This study combines kernel regression and importance sampling techniques to efficiently model grafting of metal ions onto a non-uniform ensemble of support environments. Our analysis uses a simple model of the quenched disordered support environment, grafting chemistry, and catalytic activity of the resulting grafted sites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据