4.7 Article

Diversity of Kilonova Light Curves

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 889, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab61f6

关键词

-

资金

  1. Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics [YITP-T-18-06]
  2. JSPS [JP16H02183, JP16H06342, JP17H01131, JP15K05077, JP17K05447, JP17H06361, JP15H02075, JP17H06363, 18H05859]
  3. Japanese MEXT [9]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18H05859] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We perform radiative transfer simulations for kilonova in various situations, including the cases of prompt collapse to a black hole from neutron star mergers, high-velocity ejecta possibly accelerated by magnetars, and a black hole-neutron star merger. Our calculations are done employing ejecta profiles predicted by numerical-relativity simulations and a new line list for all the r-process elements. We found that: (i) the optical emission for binary neutron stars promptly collapsing to a black hole would be fainter by greater than or similar to 1-2 mag than that found in GW170817, while the infrared emission could be as bright as that in GW170817 if the post-merger ejecta is as massive as approximate to 0.01M(circle dot); (ii) the kilonova would be brighter than that observed in GW170817 for the case that the ejecta is highly accelerated by the electromagnetic energy injection from the remnant, but within a few days it would decline rapidly and the magnitude would become fainter than in GW170817; and (iii) the optical emission from a black hole-neutron star merger ejecta could be as bright as that observed in GW170817 for the case that sufficiently large amount of matter is ejected (greater than or similar to 0.02M(circle dot)), while the infrared brightness would be brighter by 1-2 mag at the same time. We show that the difference in the ejecta properties would be imprinted in the differences in the peak brightness and time of peak. This indicates that we may be able to infer the type of the central engine for kilonovae by observation of the peak in the multiple band.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据