4.8 Review

River dam impacts on biogeochemical cycling

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT
卷 1, 期 2, 页码 103-116

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s43017-019-0019-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [PDF-516575-2018]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91547206]
  3. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skodowska-Curie grant, Euro-FLOW project [765553]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The increased use of hydropower is currently driving the greatest surge in global dam construction since the mid-20th century, meaning that most major rivers on Earth are now dammed. Dams impede the flow of essential nutrients, including carbon, phosphorus, nitrogen and silicon, along river networks, leading to enhanced nutrient transformation and elimination. Increased nutrient retention via sedimentation or gaseous elimination in dammed reservoirs influences downstream terrestrial and coastal environments. Reservoirs can also become hotspots for greenhouse gas emission, potentially impacting how 'green' hydropower is compared with fossil-fuel burning. In this Review, we discuss how damming changes nutrient biogeochemistry along river networks, as well as its broader environmental consequences. The influences of construction and management practices on nutrient elimination, the emission of greenhouse gases and potential remobilization of legacy nutrients are also examined. We further consider how regulating hydraulic residence time and environmental flows (or e-flows) can be used in planning and operation from dam conception to deconstruction. River damming can harness hydropower, control flooding and store water, but can also alter biogeochemistry in reservoirs and downstream environments. In this Review, the impacts of dams on nutrient cycling and greenhouse production are discussed, emphasizing the need to consider biogeochemical cycling at all stages of dam lifespan.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据