3.8 Article

Why does inaccessibility widely exist in healthcare in Ghana? Understanding the reasons from past to present

期刊

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG
卷 28, 期 1, 页码 1-10

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10389-019-01019-x

关键词

Inaccessibility; Accessibility; Healthcare; National Health Insurance; Ghana

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim The topic of access, or improving access, to healthcare services is a noteworthy matter, regardless of where you live. In Ghana, however, especially in rural areas, it is a critical issue worthy of investigation. Thus, we set out with the aim of exploring the specific reasons for healthcare inaccessibility in Ghana. Subject and methods Telephone interviews were conducted with 15 health directors in the Eastern, Central, and Ashanti regions of Ghana. A thematic analytical framework was used to analyze the data, which were then presented based on an a posteriori, inductive-reduction approach. Findings Six major reasons were identified: inherent inaccessibility initiated by the colonial system of administration, where essential healthcare facilities were concentrated in the capitals; economic reforms of past governments, especially the Structural Adjustment Programme which introduced the user fee system; transportation issues; urban-biased health policy implementation; the financial leakage/inefficiency/corruption that characterize interventions toward accessibility promotion; and other socio-cultural and religious beliefs that certain groups and tribes adhere to. Conclusion The authors therefore argue that there is no one main cause of healthcare inaccessibility in Ghana, but rather a confluence of issues is responsible, ranging from historical antecedents to current happenings. It is, therefore, imperative for stakeholders in the health sector to take into consideration the factors identified by the present study, in order to guide the design and implementation of policies toward improving healthcare accessibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据