4.5 Article

Calcium Bismuthate (CaBiO3): A Potential Sunlight-Driven Perovskite Photocatalyst for the Degradation of Emerging Pharmaceutical Contaminants

期刊

CHEMPHOTOCHEM
卷 4, 期 5, 页码 373-380

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cptc.201900265

关键词

calcium bismuthate; defects; ferroelectric perovskites; pharmaceutical contaminants; photocatalysis

资金

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Exp Inc.
  3. SiliCycle Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports the photocatalytic efficiencies of CaBiO3 (CBO) towards the degradation of contaminants of emerging concern (CEC), such as ciprofloxacin and tetracycline, under solar light irradiation. CaBiO3 was synthesized using glycine-complexation (GC) and ion-exchange (IE) methods. The structural difference of materials obtained by these different methods was evidenced from XRD and XPS results, and were due to the induced dual oxidation state of Bi (Bi3+/5+) in CaBiO3. The CBO synthesized by the GC method (CBO-GC) showed a broad UV/Vis absorption range from 200 to 550 nm and a band gap energy of 2.30 eV, while it was found to be 200 to 450 nm and 2.65 eV for the CBO synthesized by the IE method (CBO-IE). The VB potential of CBO-IE is shifted towards more positive potentials (+2.45 eV) as compared to the CBO-GC (+1.90 eV), and thereby the calculated CB potential of CBO-GC and CBO-IE was found to be -0.40 and -0.20 eV, respectively. Such positioning of the VB and CB favored the generation of highly reactive radicals towards the effective degradation of pollutants. These relative alignments of the bands could be mediated by the oxygen vacancy defects in the systems owing to the dual oxidation state of Bi. The photocurrent and impedance measurements demonstrated excellent charge separation and lower resistivity in CBO-GC as compared to the CBO-IE. Accordingly, the CBO-GC showed enhanced photocatalytic degradation efficiency, improved photostability and reusability as compared to that of the CBO-IE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据