4.6 Article

Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: 3-year results from a randomized controlled clinical trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
卷 44, 期 12, 页码 1294-1303

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12813

关键词

dental implant; implant surface characteristics; surgical treatment

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council [VR: 2016-01571]
  2. TUA Research Funding (The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg/Region Vastra Gotaland, Sweden)
  3. Swedish Research Council [2016-01571] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council
  4. Formas [2016-01571] Funding Source: Formas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectivesThis study reports on the 3-year follow-up of patients enrolled in a randomized controlled clinical trial on surgical treatment of advanced peri-implantitis. Material and MethodsA total of 100 patients with advanced peri-implantitis were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups. Surgical therapy aiming at pocket elimination was performed and, in three test groups, supplemented by either systemic antibiotics, use of an antiseptic agent for implant surface decontamination or both. Outcomes were evaluated after 1 and 3years by means of clinical and radiological examinations. Differences between groups were explored by regression analysis. ResultsClinical examinations at 3years after treatment revealed (i) improved peri-implant soft tissue health with a mean reduction in probing depth of 2.7mm and a reduction in bleeding/suppuration on probing of 40% and (ii) stable peri-implant marginal bone levels (mean bone loss during follow-up: 0.04mm). Implant surface characteristics had a significant impact on 3-year outcomes, in favour of implants with non-modified surfaces. Benefits of systemic antibiotics were limited to implants with modified surfaces and to the first year of follow-up. ConclusionIt is suggested that surgical treatment of peri-implantitis is effective and that outcomes of therapy are affected by implant surface characteristics. Potential benefits of systemic antibiotics are not sustained over 3years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据