4.8 Article

Controlling the structure and photophysics of fluorophore dimers using multiple cucurbit[8]uril clampings

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 812-825

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9sc04587b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Leverhulme Trust (project: Natural material innovation for sustainable living)
  2. Marie Curie FP7 SASSYPOL ITN programme [607602]
  3. EPSRC Programme Grant (NOtCH) [EP/L027151/1]
  4. ERC-2016 Consolidator Grant (CAM-RIG) [726470]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-FG02-99ER14999]
  6. EPSRC [EP/L027151/1, EP/M508007/1, EP/R013012/1, EP/N020669/1]
  7. BBSRC [BB/N007700/1]
  8. ERC [757850 BioNet]
  9. BBSRC [BB/N007700/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. EPSRC [EP/R013012/1, EP/N020669/1, EP/L027151/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. European Research Council (ERC) [726470] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A modular strategy has been employed to develop a new class of fluorescent molecules, which generates discrete, dimeric stacked fluorophores upon complexation with multiple cucurbit[8]uril macrocycles. The multiple constraints result in a static complex (remaining as a single entity for more than 30 ms) and facilitate fluorophore coupling in the ground state, showing a significant bathochromic shift in absorption and emission. This modular design is surprisingly applicable and flexible and has been validated through an investigation of nine different fluorophore cores ranging in size, shape, and geometric variation of their clamping modules. All fluorescent dimers evaluated can be photo-excited to atypical excimer-like states with elongated excited lifetimes (up to 37 ns) and substantially high quantum yields (up to 1). This strategy offers a straightforward preparation of discrete fluorophore dimers, providing promising model systems with explicitly stable dimeric structures and tunable photophysical features, which can be utilized to study various intermolecular processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据