4.6 Article

Simple and scalable synthesis of hierarchical porous carbon derived from cornstalk without pith for high capacitance and energy density

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 1469-1479

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta07864a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51403069, 31430092]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou City [201707010190]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, SCUT [2017ZX003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A sustainable one-pot route for the synthesis of hierarchical porous carbons (HPCs) from cornstalk without pith is developed. Calcium carbonate (CaCO3) as a hard template can promote the activation process and manipulate the pore structure. The interaction of CaCO3 and the activating agent (potassium oxalate) gives rise to an etching effect and gasification, which can tailor the porosity of the carbon. The removal of loose and spongy pith can improve the meso/micropore ratio, significantly increasing the electrochemical capacitance and rate capability. The as-prepared cornstalk rind-based hierarchical porous carbon (CRHPC) with an interconnected pore structure exhibits a high capacitance of 461 F g(-1) at 0.5 A g(-1) in 1 M H2SO4. Meanwhile, it displays good cycling stability, with a high capacitance retention of 90.4% at 10 A g(-1) after 10 000 cycles. Furthermore, the symmetric supercapacitor shows a high energy density of 42.5-33.3 W h kg(-1) at a power density of 0.4-9.3 kW kg(-1) and superior rate capability (78.0% capacitance retention at 20 A g(-1)). The simple removal of loose pith endows the carbon materials with an increased mesopore ratio and graphitization degree, which greatly contribute to rapid ion transportation, low internal resistance and high capacitance and energy density. This low-cost strategy holds great promise in the large-scale production of highly porous carbons from lignocellulose for advanced and efficient energy storage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据