4.6 Article

A chlorinated nonacyclic carbazole-based acceptor affords over 15% efficiency in organic solar cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 1131-1137

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta12605h

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST107-3017-F009-003]
  2. Center for Emergent Functional Matter Science of National Chiao Tung University from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this contribution, a dithienocyclopentacarbazole (DTC)-based and two dithieno[3,2-b]thiophenecyclopentacarbazole (DTTC)-based non-fullerene acceptors (NFAs) named DTC-4F, DTTC-4F and DTTC-4Cl were exploited to elucidate the effects of conjugation extension and end group chlorination. DTTC-4F was designed through conjugation extension on the basis of DTC-4F by fusing one additional thiophene on both flanks of the heptacyclic DTC core, generating the nonacyclic DTTC core. Compared with DTC-4F, DTTC-4F features up-shifted energy levels, red-shifted absorption and enhanced pi-pi interaction. PM6:DTTC-4F exhibits a decent PCE of 13.89% with a V-OC of 0.95 V, a J(SC) of 21.66 mA cm(-2) and a FF of 67.60%. Although DTTC-4F affords a reduced FF compared to DTC-4F, a DTTC-4F-based device delivers a higher PCE than DTC-4F-based devices due to the extended absorption range of DTCC-4F in comparison with DTC-4F. Since chlorinated NFAs are known to possess stronger pi-pi interaction than fluorinated NFAs, DTTC-4Cl was therefore synthesized by end-capping DTTC core with 2Cl-IC groups instead of 2F-IC groups. Moreover, DTTC-4Cl demonstrates a red-shifted absorption in comparison with DTTC-4F, which is beneficial for light-harvesting. Overall, PM6:DTTC-4Cl affords an outstanding PCE of 15.42% with a V-OC of 0.92 V, a J(SC) of 22.64 mA cm(-2) and a FF of 74.04%, which is the record PCE observed in carbazole-based NFAs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据