4.7 Article

Timing of Aspirin and Other Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Use Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer in Relation to Tumor Markers and Survival

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 35, 期 24, 页码 2806-+

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.3569

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute (NCI) [UM1 CA167551]
  2. Colon Cancer Family Registry center: Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry [U01 CA074778, U01/U24 CA097735]
  3. Colon Cancer Family Registry center: Mayo Clinic Cooperative Family Registry for Colon Cancer Studies [U01/U24 CA074800]
  4. Colon Cancer Family Registry center: Ontario Familial Colorectal Cancer Registry [U01/U24 CA074783]
  5. Colon Cancer Family Registry center: Seattle Colorectal Cancer Family Registry [U01/U24 CA074794]
  6. Colon Cancer Family Registry center: SEER Program of the NCI (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center) [N01 CN 67009, N01 PC35142, HHSN2612013000121]
  7. Minnesota Cancer Surveillance System
  8. Victorian Cancer Registry (Australia)
  9. Ontario Cancer Registry (Canada)
  10. NCI, National Institutes of Health [R01CA118699]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Regular use of aspirin is associated with improved survival for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the timing of and the subtype of CRC that would benefit the most from using aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in relation to survival is unclear. Patients and Methods In all, 2,419 patients age 18 to 74 years with incident invasive CRC who were diagnosed from 1997 to 2008 were identified from population-based cancer registries in the United States, Canada, and Australia. Detailed epidemiologic questionnaires were administered at study enrollment and at 5-year follow-up. Survival outcomes were completed through linkage to national death registries. BRAF- and KRAS-mutation status, microsatellite instability, and CpG island methylator phenotype were also evaluated. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for overall survival (OS) and CRC-specific survival. Results After a median of 10.8 years of follow-up since diagnosis, 381 deaths (100 as a result of CRC) were observed. Compared with nonusers, postdiagnostic aspirin-only users had more favorable OS (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.95) and CRC-specific survival (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.71), especially among those who initiated aspirin use (OS: HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.86; CRC-specific survival: HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.80). The association between any NSAID use after diagnosis and OS differed significantly by KRAS-mutation status (P-interaction = .01). Use of any NSAID after diagnosis was associated with improved OS only among participants with KRAS wild-type tumors (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.80) but not among those with KRAS-mutant tumors (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.96). Conclusion Among long-term CRC survivors, regular use of NSAIDs after CRC diagnosis was significantly associated with improved survival in individuals with KRAS wild-type tumors. (C) 2017 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据