4.7 Article

Gefitinib and EGFR Gene Copy Number Aberrations in Esophageal Cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 35, 期 20, 页码 2279-+

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.3934

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. AstraZeneca
  2. Merck KGaA
  3. Eli Lilly
  4. Boston Biomedical
  5. Janssen
  6. Vertebrate Antibodies (Inst)
  7. Cellgene (Inst)
  8. Gilead Sciences (Inst)
  9. Astra Zeneca
  10. Sanofi Genzyme
  11. Janssen-Cilag (Inst)
  12. Sanofi (Inst)
  13. Merck Serono (Inst)
  14. Amgen
  15. Cancer Research UK [16895] Funding Source: researchfish
  16. Chief Scientist Office [ETM/116] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeThe Cancer Esophagus Gefitinib trial demonstrated improved progression-free survival with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib relative to placebo in patients with advanced esophageal cancer who had disease progression after chemotherapy. Rapid and durable responses were observed in a minority of patients. We hypothesized that genetic aberration of the EGFR pathway would identify patients benefitting from gefitinib.MethodsA prespecified, blinded molecular analysis of Cancer Esophagus Gefitinib trial tumors was conducted to compare efficacy of gefitinib with that of placebo according to EGFR copy number gain (CNG) and EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutation status. EGFR CNG was determined by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) using prespecified criteria and EGFR FISH-positive status was defined as high polysomy or amplification.ResultsBiomarker data were available for 340 patients. In EGFR FISH-positive tumors (20.2%), overall survival was improved with gefitinib compared with placebo (hazard ratio [HR] for death, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.35 to 1.00; P = .05). In EGFR FISH-negative tumors, there was no difference in overall survival with gefitinib compared with placebo (HR for death, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.18; P = .46). Patients with EGFR amplification (7.2%) gained greatest benefit from gefitinib (HR for death, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.64; P = .006). There was no difference in overall survival for gefitinib versus placebo for patients with EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations, or for any mutation versus none.ConclusionEGFR CNG assessed by FISH appears to identify a subgroup of patients with esophageal cancer who may benefit from gefitinib as a second-line treatment. Results of this study suggest that anti-EGFR therapies should be investigated in prospective clinical trials in different settings in EGFR FISH-positive and, in particular, EGFR-amplified esophageal cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据