4.7 Article

Fierz-complete NJL model study. III. Emergence from quark-gluon dynamics

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 101, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.036004

关键词

-

资金

  1. DFG [BR 4005/4-1]
  2. Helmholtz International Center for the Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research (HIC for FAIR) within the LOEWE program of the State of Hesse
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [279384907-SFB 1245]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our understanding of the dynamics and the phase structure of dense strong-interaction matter is to a large extent still built on the analysis of low-energy models, such as those of the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio-type model. In this work, we analyze the emergence of the latter class of models at intermediate- and low-energy scales from fundamental quark-gluon interactions. To this end, we study the renormalization group flow of a Fierz-complete set of four-quark interactions and monitor their strength at finite temperature and quark chemical potential. At small quark chemical potential, we find that the scalar-pseudoscalar interaction channel is dynamically rendered most dominant by the gauge degrees of freedom, indicating the formation of a chiral condensate. Moreover, the inclusion of quark-gluon interactions leaves a significant imprint on the dynamics as measured by the curvature of the finite-temperature phase boundary which we find to be in accordance with lattice QCD results. At large quark chemical potential, we then observe that the dominance pattern of the four-quark couplings is changed by the underlying quark-gluon dynamics, without any fine-tuning of the four-quark couplings. In this regime, the scalar-pseudoscalar interaction channel becomes subleading, and the dominance pattern suggests the formation of a chirally symmetric diquark condensate. In particular, our study confirms the importance of explicit U-A(1) breaking for the formation of this type of condensate at high densities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据