4.8 Article

Parallel weight update protocol for a carbon nanotube synaptic transistor array for accelerating neuromorphic computing

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 2040-2046

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9nr08979a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Nano Material Technology Development Program - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [2016M3A7B4910430]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2019R1A2C1002491, 2019R1A2B5B01069988, 2016R1A5A1012966]
  3. Future Semiconductor Device Technology Development Program - MOTIE (Ministry of Trade, Industry Energy) [10067739]
  4. KSRC (Korea Semiconductor Research Consortium)
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019R1A2C1002491, 4299990113917] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Brain-inspired neuromorphic computing has the potential to overcome the inherent inefficiency of the conventional von Neumann architecture by using the massively parallel processing power of artificial neural networks. Neuromorphic parallel processing can be implemented naturally using the crossbar geometry of synaptic device arrays with Ohm's and Kirchhoff's laws. However, selective and parallel weight updates of the synaptic crossbar array are still very challenging due to the unavoidable crosstalk between adjacent devices and sneak path currents. Here, we experimentally demonstrate a weight update protocol in a carbon nanotube synaptic transistor array, where selective and parallel weight updates can be executed by exploiting the individually controllable three terminals of the synaptic device via a localized carrier trapping mechanism. The trained 9 x 8 synaptic array solves four different convolution operations simultaneously for the feature extraction of an image. The massive parallelism and robustness of the weight update protocol are important features toward effective manipulation of big data through neuromorphic computing systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据