4.1 Article

In vitro Antibacterial Efficacy of Non-Antibiotic Growth Promoters in Poultry Industry

期刊

JOURNAL OF POULTRY SCIENCE
卷 57, 期 1, 页码 45-54

出版社

JAPAN POULTRY SCIENCE ASSOC
DOI: 10.2141/jpsa.0190042

关键词

antibiotic growth promoters; antibacterial activity; phytobiotics; poultry; probiotics

资金

  1. King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) [1-17-01-001-0065]
  2. KACST

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) have been used for many years as supplements in various livestock diets, including those for poultry. However, the use of AGPs in feed was also associated with an increasing number of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in livestock. In this study, the in vitro antibacterial efficacies of eight commercially available non-AGPs suitable for use in poultry were investigated. Assessments included a combination of antibacterial activity assays and estimations of the minimal inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations along with scanning electron microscopy analysis. The results showed that the probiotic, CloStat (R) exerted a bacteriostatic effect against all tested bacteria, namely Salmonella Typhimurium, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Clostridium perfringens, whereas Gallipro Tect (R) and Bacillus Blend (R) demonstrated bacteriostatic activity towards most of the pathogens tested. Other commercial non-AGPs, Sangrovit (R), Fysal (R), and Mix oil blend (R) showed a stronger or equal antibacterial activity compared to the positive control (AGP Maxus (R) G100) againsts all bacteria tested, except C. perfringens. Nor-Spice AB (R) and Varium (TM) did not show any significant effect against the tested bacteria. Several of the tested AGP substitutes exhibited good antibacterial efficiency against pathogenic bacteria and thus may be good candidates for second-stage in vivo investigations into reducing pathogen colonization in broilers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据