4.5 Article

A generalized regression model based on hybrid empirical mode decomposition and support vector regression with back-propagation neural network for mid-short-term load forecasting

期刊

JOURNAL OF FORECASTING
卷 39, 期 5, 页码 737-756

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/for.2655

关键词

back-propagation neural network (BPNN); empirical mode decomposition (EMD); general regression; information theory; mid-short-term load forecasting; support vector regression (SVR)

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 108-2410-H-161-004]
  2. Science and Technology of Henan Province of China [182400410419]
  3. Startup Foundation for Doctors [PXY-BSQD-2014001]
  4. Foundation for Fostering the National Foundation of Pingdingshan University [PXY-PYJJ-2016006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since load forecasting plays a decisive role in the safe and stable operation of power systems, it is particularly important to explore forecasting methods accurately. In this article, the hybrid empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and support vector regression (SVR) with back-propagation neural network (BPNN), namely the EMDHR-SVR-BPNN model, is proposed. Information theory is mainly used to solve the data tendency problem, and the EMD method is used to solve the data volatility problem. There is no interaction between these two methods; thus these two models can complement each other through generalized regression of orthogonal decomposition. Taking the load data from the New South Wales (NSW, Australia) market as an example, the obtained simulation results are compared with other models. It is concluded that the proposed EMDHR-SVR-BPNN model not only improves the forecasting accuracy but also has good fitting ability. It can reflect the changing tendency of data in a timely manner, providing a strong basis for the electricity generation of the power sector in the future, thus reducing electricity waste. The proposed EMDHR-SVR-BPNN model has potential for employment in mid-short term load forecasting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据