4.7 Article

Whose village? Stakeholder interests in the urban renewal of Hubei old village in Shenzhen

期刊

LAND USE POLICY
卷 91, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104411

关键词

Urban village; Urban regeneration; Shared interest; Stakeholders; Hubei Shenzhen

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018ECNUHLYT012]
  2. Shanghai Philosophy and Social Science Planning Project [2018ECK001]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41771174, 41822104]
  4. Key Project of Chief Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of MOE [17JJD790007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article examines the urban regeneration process of Hubei old village in Shenzen, and focuses on interest sharing among stakeholders. Urban regeneration processes are driven by the decreasing availability of construction land in Shenzhen's city centre due to rapid urbanization and an unplanned, overcrowded urban core. The solution accepted by most stakeholders, i.e., local government, private developers, and urban villagers, is to generate land revenue through the demolition of urban villages like Hubei old village, thus clearing way for Shenzen's urban development and transformation. However, tenants and small business operators do not benefit from the rising land and property value, and thus do not share the interests of other stakeholders. A further complication to Shenzen's urban regeneration process is added by those who do not live in Hubei old village but have vocally fought to preserve its architectural heritage. By examining the urban regeneration process of Hubei old village in Shenzhen, this article provides a case study of the complex dynamics of the Hubei urban regeneration program and participatory planning process, taking as a starting point a question posed by an urban villager during an interview: whose village?, i.e., who has the right to make decisions on behalf of the urban village?

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据