4.5 Article

Resistin polymorphims, plasma resistin levels and obesity in Tunisian volunteers

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.22227

关键词

levels; obesity; polymorphisms; resistin; tunisian volunteers

资金

  1. Tunisian Ministry of Higher Education, Scientific Research and Technology
  2. Tunisian Ministry of Health [LR12SP11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundAdipose tissue is an important endocrine organ that secretes a number of adipokines, like Resistin (RETN); it's an adipocytes-secreted cytokine and has been proposed as a link between obesity and diabetes. Many resistin gene polymorphisms were described and their implication in obesity was controversial. This study was to investigate the prevalence of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in RETN gene 420C/G; 44G/A; 62G/A; 394C/G and 299 G/A and their association with Resistin level and obesity in Tunisian volunteers. MethodsWe recruited 169 nonobese (mean age=42.16-14.26years; mean body mass index [BMI]=24.51-3.69kg/m(2)) and 160 obese (mean age=47.86-11.17years; mean BMI=36-4.78kg/m(2)). Genotyping was performed using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. Anthropometric parameters, lipid levels, Glycemia and insulinemia were measured, BMI was calculated and insulinresistance was evaluated with the homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and resistin level was measured by ELISA. Statistical analyses were performed by SPSS19.0. ResultsAfter adjustment for confounding parameters; the Odds Ratio (OR) of obesity associated with mutated genotypes at 420C/G compared with normal genotype was as: OR=2.17; 95% CI [1.28-3.68], P=.004. The serum Resistin levels present no significant association with all RETN polymorphisms and it was significantly associated with BMI (P=.047). In our haplotype analysis, one haplotype seems to be protective and one other seems to be the highest risk to obesity. ConclusionThe 420 C/G Polymorphism were associated with obesity and Leptin concentration in our population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据