4.5 Article

Pretreatment platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with the response to first-line chemotherapy and survival in patients with metastatic gastric cancer

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.22185

关键词

chemotherapy; gastric cancer; platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; tumor response

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project [2013ZX09303002]
  2. Science and Technology Plan Project of Liaoning Province [2011404013-1, 2014225013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundSeveral studies have shown that platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is a prognostic factor for various cancers. However, there is no study about the role of PLR in predicting response to first-line chemotherapy of metastatic gastric cancer. Therefore, this study aimed to establish whether PLR is associated with the response to first-line chemotherapy and survival in patients with metastatic gastric cancer. MethodsWe enrolled 273 patients diagnosed with metastatic gastric cancer. The best cut-off value of PLR to predict chemotherapeutic response was chosen by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Prognostic significance was determined using the log-rank test and multivariate Cox regression analysis. ResultsBased on the cut-off value of PLR, patients were divided into a low PLR group and high PLR group. In logistic regression analysis, the low PLR group had a significantly higher disease control rate than the high PLR group had (91.3 vs 76.1%, P=.002), and PLR was an independent risk factor for response to first-line chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR]: 3.256; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.521-6.969; P=.002). The low PLR group had significantly longer overall survival (OS) than the high PLR group had (13.4 vs 9.2months; P=.020). Multivariate survival analysis showed that PLR was significantly associated with OS [hazard ratio (HR): 1.002; 95% CI: 1.000-1.003; P=.020]. ConclusionsPre-treatment PLR is associated with the response rate to first-line chemotherapy and survival outcomes in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据