4.5 Article

The prognostic impact of serum bilirubin in stage IV colorectal cancer patients

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.22272

关键词

bilirubin; colorectal cancer; overall survival; prognosis

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  2. University Graduate Student Scientific Innovation Project of Jiangsu [SJZZ16_0047]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundBilirubin played a great role in antioxidation and anticancer and has been considered as a promising prognostic factor of non-liver disease-related death in various cancers. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of pre-treatment serum bilirubin in stage IV CRC patients. MethodsSerum bilirubin including TBIL, DBIL, and IBI which were tested at pre-treatment were investigated in 154 stage IV CRC patients in Zhongda Hospital, Nanjing, China, from July 2005 to July 2011. X-tile program was used to determine the optimal cut-off values of these three biomarkers. Kaplan-Meier analysis, univariate, and multivariate cox regression as well as time-dependent ROC curve analysis were performed to evaluate the relations between serum bilirubin and survival outcomes. ResultsWe got the results that the optimal cut-off points of serum TBIL, DBIL, and IBI levels were 12.9, 6.1, and 4.8mol/L, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that elevated TBIL, DBIL, and CEA were significantly associated with poor 5-year OS in stage IV CRC patients. Multivariate cox analysis indicated that the high DBIL (HR=1.603, 95%CI=1.053-2.442, P<.028) and CEA (HR=1.785, 95%CI=1.123-2.837, P=.014) could be identified as independent factors for poor OS. Furthermore, time-dependent ROC curves demonstrated that high DBIL had similar prognostic efficacy as elevated CEA for poor OS (AUC=0.63 and 0.61, respectively). ConclusionsPre-treatment elevated TBIL and DBIL levels were associated with poor OS in stage IV CRC patients. Moreover, DBIL could be considered as an independent prognostic biomarker for OS. Furthermore, DBIL had similar prognostic efficacy as CEA for OS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据