4.8 Article

Type 2 innate lymphoid cells treat and prevent acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 127, 期 5, 页码 1813-1825

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI91816

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01 CA 66794, R01 HL 115761, R01 CA 72669, R01 HL56067, R37 AI029564, F32 HL126365]
  2. Medical Research Council [U105178805]
  3. Wellcome Trust [100963/Z/13/Z]
  4. American Cancer Society
  5. MRC [MC_U105178805, MR/M011755/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Medical Research Council [MR/M011755/1, MC_U105178805] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Wellcome Trust [100963/Z/13/Z] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is the most common complication for patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Despite extremely aggressive therapy targeting donor T cells, patients with grade III or greater aGVHD of the lower GI tract, who do not respond to therapy with corticosteroids, have a dismal prognosis. Thus, efforts to improve understanding of the function of local immune and non-immune cells in regulating the inflammatory process in the GI tract during aGVHD are needed. Here, we demonstrate, using murine models of allogeneic BMT, that type 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) in the lower GI tract are sensitive to conditioning therapy and show very limited ability to repopulate from donor bone marrow. Infusion of donor ILC2s was effective in reducing the lethality of aGVHD and in treating lower GI tract disease. ILC2 infusion was associated with reduced donor proinflammatory Th1 and Th17 cells, accumulation of donor myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) mediated by ILC2 production of IL-13, improved GI tract barrier function, and a preserved graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) response. Collectively, these findings suggest that infusion of donor ILC2s to restore gastrointestinal tract homeostasis may improve treatment of severe lower GI tract aGVHD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据